Jump to content

jcoyne

Members
  • Posts

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

484 profile views

jcoyne's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

2

Reputation

  1. Hi Guys, I have used the export to Relativity for years, but see that Intella can now also interface with Relativity but only on legacy on-pre version. Are there plans to interface the Intella export directly into RelativityOne - i.e the cloud on based offering? I was talking to Brainspace this morning and they already interface to pull and push data from Rel1 so it must be possible.
  2. Hi Guys - we are current Intella team and Intella connect users and currently utilize Magnet Axiom in our forensic investigations. We would love to test out W4 Best regards, Jason Coyne
  3. Hi Todd, yes we are seeing this in many cases now, typically where documents have been image scanned and therefore the digital metadata needs to be explained. The client just wants to read the docs in chronological order, they are happy to have a team of admin clerks viewing every document and gathering the 'actual date' rather than the data it was scanned but then there is nothing that can be done to get this back into Intella. We've logged a mail with support so fingers crossed for the future.
  4. Cool - so I actually already had it. I've granted the additional permission and now I can see it. Works really well but anyway I could run multi-threaded or run more processes in parallel - it appears to only run on one core?
  5. Thanks Jon, I'm currently on 2.0.1, I'll download this 2.0.1.1 - I cant see a changelog or release note between this and 2.0.1 can you advise?
  6. Fab Jon - this will really assist. When will this version be available to download?
  7. Hi Guys, We have been discussing this pre-caching idea for previews since April 2015 - is it on the development road map yet?
  8. I'm now getting the error Cannot find HASP SRM Run-time Environment DLL (E0004) On windows 10 Pro. on Intella version 2.01 Will the same suggested fix still work on 'modern' windows and intella versions ?
  9. Hi Guys, this issue for me is back on my Radar. Today I have received an order to 'delete' all of the copies of 1 single document that I have in an intella case. It contains some confidential material which can no longer be seen by the reviewers The case has been indexed up for months, loads of tags/comments all saved on millions of documents and it looks like I will need to completely rebuild the entire case without this one document. I've investigated with the lawyers if I can use the 'restricted' option within the user authorization to prevent them from seeing it, but this will not be allowed because I will be unable to say that I have completely deleted it. The load file/overlay file is a lot better these days, but it struggles with documents that have multiple tags. Are you any closer to being able to have controlled functionality to enable the removal (or at least replace the record of the text and preview) a document from the underlying database? It is possible to get R/W access to the underlying database to purge one document record ? I understand that Intella competitors have a 'record replacement' function which they use to effectively swap out for a blank placeholder Best regards, Jason
  10. Hi Guys, Is there a way to replace the OCR'd text within Intella for document redacted within Intella? For example:- Initially Tiff's and empty PDF's were OCR'd and the text read back into Intella. The reviewers reviewed and redacted thousands of documents. Its currently easy to locate the redacted documents in Intella, so I could export them and OCR them again. But then the text files are only outside of Intella and they will be named with either MD5 hash or Item_ID - or some other variable. When I export via load file, I will place-holder the text within the text files directory of the redacted items - but the redacted files are now amongst thousand of other image files, and probably named 000001.000001.0000034 or what ever. It is now quite difficult to marry up the redacted text files. If you OCR the redacted files at this point, it not easy to locate the redacted files within the thousands of others. Its even harder if you exported Tiff Image files as there will be one image file per page and the Text file needs to display the text for all of the pages in one file. Has anyone found a good workflow for this scenario? Best regards, Jason
  11. Hi Jason, We have recently moved to 2 x Dell 730xd's 1 for Intella Pro and the other for Intella Connect. These are only 2U but have 12 drive bays on the front with 2 flexi bays at the back. We have configured these with 12x2TB drives on the front in a Raid 10 array for the evidence and storing the case data and 2x120gb SSD's spanned as an optimisation drive smaller cases. We've also done some testing with using SoftPerfects RAM disk - setting 50% of the system ram after windows has booted to be 256GB ram drive. For Optimisation drive and the 2x120 SSD's for the case storage. Which is great for the preparation of the smaller matters before pushing them onto the spindle storage. To be honest, I'm not too sure that the optimisation drive config in Intella really makes that much difference over the spindles - but the type of material being analysed will make a difference. These kit has been installed for a few months now and next week we are moving them from Physical to Virtual because we want to use the spare CPU thread for OCR'ing for the times that the machines are just ticking over.
  12. Can see it now. Thanks - that does address the issue
  13. Hi Jason, Thats sounds like the Solution, sorry I cant see the your attachment.
×
×
  • Create New...