Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'processing'.
-
Hi, There are a few tasks, like Hreading and AI Coding that are very machine memory consuming. As those are background tasks, they use the current Intella Connect server memory and processor to ran. It will be verry nice if we could use another machine to perform this kind of tasks, like a NODE machine instead the current Connect Server. TKS Delson
- 1 reply
-
- predictive coding
- node
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hello, I currently have an OST that is processing in 2.0.1 and seems to have stalled out. It spent about 2 hours actively processing about 550,000 items as I would expect, but since then, it has elapsed 16 hours with no additional items processed. Has this been encountered before and is it a known issue? Is it a bad/corrupt OST? Or am I just being impatient and there really isn't an issue? For an environment baseline, my machine has 32GBs RAM, 8 core CPU, 4 active crawlers, 2 GB memory per crawler (set in the ini file to fix a previous issue), and I have indexed PSTs/OSTs larger than t
- 6 replies
-
- crawling
- processing
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi everyone, I am opening this topic as quite a few questions related to the folder showed up in our support system recently. For everyone who overlooked the explanation in the User Manual: Note, that these items are not visible when the PST file is opened in Outlook. Typically they are left-overs from Outlook's own processing and may disappear when the PST file is compacted by Outlook. You can think of orphaned items as a special type of recovered items. It is normal that parts of the body or email headers are missing. FAQs related to : 1) Are these orphan items normally availab
-
- orphan items
- processing
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi guys Two questions After working with Intella for a number of years, I have faced a number of scenarios where we have processed data separately and would like to then "join or merge" the indexes/data together. We have a number of Intella Team licences and would like to be able to make use of 3/4 processing servers to process different sets of data and then ultimately... merge the data/indexes together that could then be shared with the reviewers A second question is that if we have processed 5 custodians, it is easy to add a 6th custodian to the case, however, is there functiona
-
- 1
-
-
- processing
- case management
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with: