[Boolean logic question]

Thank you for the feedback, Alex.
Actually what I want is finding a match of any term from the 3 conditions in a sequential order. For example: TRES PORCENTO PAULO in a document (doesn't matter if there are double quotes on them). So if I try "(tr?s OR 3) (porcento OR percento) (jos? OR paulo)" I will look for the conditions as one string, which is not what I want. Below there is an example of what I do not want to have from the query ("TR?S" OR "3") ("PORCENTO" OR "PERCENTO" OR "%") ("JOS?" OR "PAULO")


It returned 3 três highlighted while I was looking for highlighting something such as 3 PORCENTO JOSE. 

About the Highlight hits, it is exactly what you replied. Sorry for not explaining it clearly. 

[Is it possible to highlight terms from special characters/conditions in the search?]

For example:

I put "pol?cia federal" in my keyword list, then I get my hits and start reviewing an artifact by opening it. When I click to Highlight hits, could it highlight "polÍcia federal", "polzcia federal" and "polycia federal"? Currently it does not seem to work this way (evaluate the condition and then highlight the possible matches)

[Boolean logic question]

I have a question about the logic of the query below:

("TR?S" OR "3") ("PORCENTO" OR "PERCENTO" OR "%") ("JOS?" OR "PAULO")  

With this search, when I open an e-mail and click on Highlight hits, it counts and show a hit with just the term "3" (Chapter 3, for example). Shouldn't be highlighting just if there was a full match like "3% PAULO", as it is based on three AND conditions? 

[Running Intella within a Hyper-V virtual machine environment]

Hello Jon,

Thanks for the information. I have a question from a potential customer. He has all machines virtualized and he wants to know if it is possible to use/license/activate Intella without an USB dongle (Internet validation, for example).