jcoyne

Hi Guys, Ive seen this twice now on Intella connect, the user is conducting a review of the documents (old way - not batch review) and the next/right arrow becomes greyed out before they get to the end of the number (In this instance at 51 of 435) and could not proceed until they reloaded the results on the main screen and started to review again. On both occasions it has occurred when the users have had an exclude set to exclude any documents that already have a tag applied by any of other users. I do wonder the if the issue is caused by one of the documents in the 435 being tagged by another user on the same case whilst this user is conducting their own review, i.e the number of documents to be reviewed is actually reducing from the 435 all of the time as multiple reviewers work. - is this possible? or does Connect store the list of 435 documents and what ever happens this user should get to see these?

Hi On connect 1.9.1 when you create hierarchical tags should the top level reflect the total numbers of documents under it? In the above screen shot, the top level tag is 1 but does not equal the total of Not Relevant and Relevant

Hi Guys, We have noticed that for the edisclosure jobs where a linear review of many documents is required, a facility to not only de-duplicate exact matches but also near matches is required. This is most commonly request when you have many mailboxes where the subject line, sender and recipients and content of two emails are the same, the only difference is the dates & times in the email headers are different. For many reviews these are 'identical' from a categorization point of view and should be filtered by some form of dedup functionality. Are there any plans for this on the horizon? ​Does any one have any strategies how this may be dealt with currently? Best regards, Jason

Fab - do we know we 1.9.2 is going to be released?

Hi Guys, Can Intella report the page count - either on a per document basis? The only method I can think of currently is by doing a export to PDF and seeing how many pages appear in the final document - but this would be quite slow. I already accept that page count will be quite unreliable when it comes to Excel documents etc

Thanks Adam, I've give Veeam a try.

Hi Jon, Thank you for your response. We are going through the process of manually finding the most relevant documents and noting the Intella Item_ID in the spreadsheet. (there is 1200 so whilst not a great manual process is do'able) Once we have this file (CSV file or similar) how do we import into Intella and get it to write the relativity ID's to a field in the appropriate Item_ID's record. I have done this previously via a load file import, but never via the overlay functionality?

Hi Guys, I'd welcome any wisdom on the best way of backing up Connect cases. Currently I rsync the whole case directory to another drive, but notice that all of the files that the user has previewed appears in the directory structure - which are not really needed for the backup. I only really need the ability to backup the annotations (comments, tags, saved searches, lists etc)

Hi, We have a client who we are attempting to steal away from relativity. The client has provided us with a few pst's of the files that they are currently viewing in relativity and a report setting out an internal relativity number, which they refer to DocID and to which email subject line it refers too. We do not have (and likely cannot get) a load file, neither do me have message ID or MD5 meaning that its not 100% sure we can match with a unique email. we may be able to get message ID's from relativity. I would be keen to know how I can Import or 'Overlay' the relativity DocID over the relevant Intella Item ID's using the overlay functionality in the current version. All comments welcomed.

Ah thanks - I've give that a go and thank you for your efforts. As a quick fix last night we used a python script to switch it around after output.

Thanks Lukas, Whilst many companies will have rules, we are a service provider across both civil & criminal investigations and in civil in both claimant & respondent positions. Our customers are Global across many jurisdictions therefore the review processes are practically always different. Many will want to review each document then its attachment but others will only want to include the email bodies in date order then only if relevant will they look at the attachments (if they know that there is one). This is easy with the legacy preview pane as the attachment tab displayed the number of attachments in brackets. The current implementation of the batch reviewer (which I really like!) does not tell you. Therefore if you see email, then next a word document you don't know if the word document was attached to the email or is just a loose document chronologically after the email - in a way you are losing some of the context. Any sort of indication that displayed the "has attachments" field or better still that stepped in/ indented the document from its email above in the batch list down the left had side would be great (example attached from Recommind review panel).

Hi we have a requirement to export native documents that are named with the date prefixed to the filename, but to ensure that they can be ordered correctly alphanumeric they want yyyy.MM.dd.hh.mm.filename.ext Intella currently supports %primary_date% in the filename which is getting close but it always appears to be dd_MM_yyyy - any advice? best regards, Jason Coyne

The batch reviewer functionality is really good, just done a test and I think you could achieve about 750 documents per hour linear review which is so much faster than the competitors. But I cant see anywhere an indicator that shows that the email currently in review has attachments and/or a swift way to include a review of these attachments as part of the batch review. I can see how you could include the attachments as part of creating the initial batching but they really need to be reviewed after the body of the email, not just as lone documents at the end of the review. I can see that sometimes the 'preview' button is greyed out but don't think that this correlates with attachments I'm i missing something are is this something that can be added in the near future?

There is a further security issue with having access to coding layout preferences. You can see coding layouts created for other cases (that you may not have been granted access to). For example if I created a coding layout with tags relevant to a child protection case:- relates to suspect john smith relates to suspect peter jones Contains Cat 1 images etc Then a totally separate case (on the same connect server) needs to set up batches for their say fraud investigation, they can import the same coding layout and tags. The creation of the coding layout available for a specific case needs to be a global system administrator role (or dont share coding layouts across cases) Any chance that this would be interim fixed and that you can issue a patch? Best regards Jason

Sorted it - just needed to remove and add the user back to the case. BTW - the batching and review structure is really sweet functionality.

Plus 1 for this, just had a recommind demo and this was a real nice to have.

1.9.1 in Connect I have managed to create a reviewer subjective coding panel, but I dont have the create a batch on the right click, Is this a user credentials issue? I have added the 'can create reviewer batches' to the admin user (which I am already) and I have restarted the case. Do I have to remove and re-add the user to the case, or even restart connect to get it to applied the credentials?

http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2016/february/uk-court-approves-use-of-predictive-coding-as-basis-for-e-disclosure-for-the-first-time/ In light of the UK approving the user of Predictive Coding as part of the document review, I would like to see Vound either implementing a Predictive coding engine into Intella or providing an interfacing mechanism (perhaps similar to the external OCR process?) into the product. I know that the Intella has grown up in the forensic search space but a significant part of its future use could/should be in edisclosure review. Any views would be welcomed, even is it's 'no way!'

HI we are about to start a collection in Georgia (the one near Russia). Will Intella handle the indexing of the Georgian/Russian charater set OK? Like This Quote MultiQuote

We have Intella connect on it's own vlan which can only communicate via HTTPS to a watchguard firebox appliance. Users can only gain access to the watchguard appliance through two factors of authentication (one provided by the watchguard username/password the other provided by a vasco secure ID app on the user's phone.) It makes for a very robust system - with lots of auditing

Is the pre-caching concept any nearer?

Hi, I want to move a number of my intella connect cases from (say) c:\Intella cases\Case1 to d:\Intella cases\case1 Within the admin panel you can only add or delete a case. I dont really want to delete a call and re-add it as I will have to allocate all of the users to the case. Id there a conf file that I can edit ? Best regards, Jason Coyne

Hi - is this now available in the released 1.9 ? I can see the connect end of it but I cant see how to configure the processor end. Is it part of team?

Will Intella connect run well with SSL on port 443 - if so where do you edit the port number (I currently use 8090 none SSL)

Great - sounds like a plan. It really is quite an important 'need'. Intella has historically struggled as a eD review platform against the strong products that were weak in search but strong is linear review where you need to be making a decision on a document in 2-3 seconds. Then with 1.7 connect the lightning speed for linear review made it a winner. I'm keen for it not to slip back because of this slow down. As forensic search techies we are happy to use the contents pane and review the text based preview - but lawyers are not suited to this, they need the full wiziwig preview of the native document. Fingers crossed Best regards, Jason