tufelkinder

It would be great to Beta Connect! I heard Peter talk about it and do a small demo of it in DC a couple of months ago and have been excited to hear more ever since!

If you run into the "88087.xml" error during install, don't cancel or ignore just switch to an Explorer window and create the Vendors folder, then continue the installation. Inside of the Intella folder Windows 7: c:\users\<username>\AppData\Roaming\Intella Windows XP: c:\Documents and Settings\<username>\Application Data\Intella there should be a 'cases' folder. Can you try renaming this when Intella isn't launching and then see if it launches?

You can connect to a shared case from up to 8 workstations at the same time and see other people's comments/previews/tags scroll by in real time. Shared is a really great way to manage multiple users, but you are right -- as far as I know there is no way to grant access permissions to permit users to view different information.

Adam, Just for testing, try renaming or removing your %APPDATA%\Roaming\Intella folder. I ran into this problem a few months ago and it seems like something in the case.xml or cases folder would get corrupted and cause it to stop launching. Walt -~

One other feature that would be really helpful/useful: the ability to turn off deleting all files in the Export folder location when doing a new export!

You're right, Intella does behave this way -- but only in the Tags Facet list. If you go to tag a document (or add a new tag), it does not permit this. Instead, in my experience, it jumps to the text field as soon as you start typing. They could use the text field as a filter box... As the user types a tag name, it narrows the list of tags in auto-complete fashion. Also, this would help prevent users from entering similarly named tags.

While this isn't the most efficient way imaginable, it is REALLY useful to have this feature. I was able to recreate a couple thousand tags in just a couple of hours using this method. Thanks Kathleen! Walt -~

Any thoughts regarding having the ability to organize tags into folders? Especially since there's currently no way to quickly filter to the tag you want, if you have 100 or so tags, it can be quite a task to locate the correct tag quickly.

I have had this problem occur on a number of different versions of windows. One solution is to create the folder it is asking for: C:\Program Files\Common Files\Aladdin Shared\HASP\vendors\ if it does not already exist, then continue the installation and the Intella installer will add the relevant xml file. (At least, this has worked for my several times in the past.)

You could setup a tesseract server... Or you could use SHMSoft's processing product to do that step for you. http://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/ http://shmsoft.com/index.php/shmcloud

I'm fine with starting over and reindexing as a completely new case, except for the process of recreating all of the tags (around 2,100 between the two cases). What do you mean "import those hashes into your other case?" How is this process done? Thanks, Walt -~

Is it possible to export a set of tags and message/document hashes from one Intella case and import those into another case? For example, I have two cases that have some shared evidence and the cases have now been merged. I would like to also merge the tags from the two cases and evidence into a single case. Is this possible? Thanks, Walt -~

My understanding was that the outer circles used to indicate the total number of hits for a term while the overlapping circle indicated the number of documents that responded to both (or all) of the terms, but based on your description I tested "manage" excluding "transfer... [etc]" and it seems to now be applying an exclude function for the other search terms. Maybe this has always been the behavior and I have just misunderstood it in the past? 1.6.1 just updated to 1.6.2 and behavior is the same. I don't remember noticing this under 1.5.4 or 1.6.

How is it possible to have more overlapping hits than the smallest of the original bubbles?

Tentatively it looks like this is fixed in 1.6.2...

If you wanted to avoid adding more overhead to the interface, just having the ability to specify more precision in the search keywords text field would be great. For example, instead of expanding Options and deselecting all but Author, simply allow users to search for (in gmail fashion): to:email@host.com from:email@another.host.com bcc:email@address This way the features would be there for advanced users, documented in help, but without adding to the GUI and requiring additional mouse clicks, not to mention further confusing or complicating the interface for Intella newbies. Just a thought! Walt -~

Intella Team supports up to 8 reviewers, according to the specification. I believe additional Reviewer licenses are or were $595 even though the web site still lists them as being $395.

Will that be added again in the future...? The ability to sort would help, but even if you could just "hide" a source for visual purposes that would be extremely helpful.

Is there any way -- even a manual method -- of removing sources so that they no longer appear in the case or in the Locations Facet? I'm using Intella 1.6 and reprocessing a whole case is just not an option at this point but we have several invalid imports that are just hanging out in the Locations facet confusing things. In addition, it would be really nice if we could reorder sources, or simply have them display alphabetically. Thanks, Walt -~

Does Intella support the Lotus Notes Template File (NTF) format? If not, does anyone have a way to convert these files to NSF? Thank you, Walt -~

My typical steps are to create an include search then add three or more search terms. Then, as I start removing the search terms one at a time, the bubble will form. I will try to submit a complete screenshot, but there really aren't any other settings or criteria that I'm using (that I know of).

Actually, here is a screenshot with nothing sensitive. You can see that I'm only searching for two keywords with one include and yet I have 3 source cluster bubbles. This does not happen all the time, in fact it took me a couple searches to get this result. Thanks, Walt

Intella 1.6 Bubble displays sometimes shows includes as a separate bubble in the visual search display, but other times it does not appear. I would prefer that it not appear, just like an exclude, and it's confusing when it shows up. Is this a bug or an option that I can control somehow? Thanks, Walt -~

Thank you for your response; I will definitely be providing feedback as the project unfolds. Walt -~

Sorry, to clarify: I'm asking about search performance moreso than indexing performance. Once you have the data in Intella, etc. The case in question is an estimated 6TB and 13,000,000 documents. I have Intella Team, and that's what I'm recommending to the client.