Jump to content

tufelkinder

Members
  • Content Count

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

tufelkinder last won the day on May 23 2013

tufelkinder had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About tufelkinder

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. Does anyone have any experience or advice regarding configuring Nginx as a reverse proxy for Intella Connect? Or any advice regarding any reverse proxy and successfully passing authentication? The login page loads perfectly, but I keep getting an authentication error from Connect no matter what configuration parameters I use: location / { proxy_buffering off; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header Authorization $http_authorization; #
  2. One of the biggest issues I've had to deal with to date is managing duplicates across a case and across a custodian. For example, in a current case the entire company has a policy of emailing their logo as an attachment. I now have 100,000+ copies of this image in the case. However, if one of my reviewers marks an email as Relevant and another users marks a different email as Non-Relevant, but they both have Tag duplicates and Tag families turned on, this creates a situation in which I have a lot of files tagged with both Relevant and Non-Relevant. On the other hand, if I don't tag wit
  3. Hi Łukasz, Custodians A couple useful functions that could be achieved from having this as a built-in object type would be managing Custodians as a datapoint/field when exporting/producing data (Not sure tags would help with this?), organization of evidence/data, and reporting and stats. On a recent case, we were asked to provide hit counts for a keyword set across custodians. In Relativity I was able to do this using the Pivot table function -- not a fan of Relativity, but it was nice to be able to get these kinds of stats within a single function. Or, how many hits per custodian hav
  4. Maybe I'm not using the correct terminology. The client wanted each custodians dataset deduplicated against only that custodian's data. Let me try to describe what actually transpired: I did a single production of data from these custodians and provided it to the client. They came back to me and complained that the duplicate copies of attachments across custodians had not been produced. So, if Custodian James sent an attachment to Custodian Bill, I was producing two emails (one from James' mail and one from Bill's) but only one attachment -- even though the attachment was technically inclu
  5. If I turn on deduplication and then search all locations as you described, won't it de-deuplicate across locations?
  6. Indeed, oops! So the problem with using Location as custodian is that there is no ability to edit sources/locations after they've been added or relate them to each other or organize them. For example: if I receive a hard drive image for a custodian, I can place it in a "custodian" folder and index it. Then, if I want to later add a new source of data, such as a server PST file, or a cell phone image or something, then if I add that to the custodian folder I need to re-index the whole case. If I add it as a separate source I can't associate it with the custodian folder. At least, unless I'm
  7. Just to follow-up: the lack of ability to assign subsets of documents to reviewers as batches cost me a project to Relativity, so this would be really beneficial. Plus, I think Intella could build a lot better Batch function than Relativity has. For example, live batches vs. static batches: live batches could be based on a search or some criteria that automatically updates as new evidence is added to the case. So the reviewer can just check for new documents and they will appear when they are available. Also, a cool component would be if documents disappeared in real-time from the bubble a
  8. Hierarchical tags sounds awesome! I can't wait to see this in action. Definitely a feature that my users have been requesting for a long time... Two more wish list items for you. 1) Custodians: The ability to organize data by definite Custodians would be really helpful in making data interchange in and out of Intella more consistent and universal across other products. To take it a step further, we recently ran into a major export where the client was requesting Custodian-level deduplication and this posed a challenge for us to accomplish efficiently in Intella. 2) Simple Text Anal
  9. Intella 8 doesn't seem to respect the Indexing setting for Index Content embedded in documents; when I indexed identical material between the two versions with this setting disabled, 1.8b1 generated ~11,000 results, 1.7 generated ~6,500. I would like to see more permissions options (such as: - Review Case and Apply but not Edit/Create Tags - Restrict User to These Tags (the inverse of the current option) -- this could be used to create batching, while batching with the current method would be difficult to manage. The Type and Locations Facets do not load in the Manager, and the Type
  10. I would very much like to test this out!
  11. Oh, like a time range slider, or "all events between these dates" filter... if it could visually update/animate over a certain time range? That would be really cool! You could watch traffic patterns build between two people, for example. Regarding the merging of entities, automatic would be great for sure, but I'm just thinking in cases where you have a clear person of interest, it would helpful to be able to manually group multiple email addresses (or other identifying information) into a single node. All of these features sound excellent! Now if I could just import phone call logs as
  12. So I'm definitely loving the new Social Graph feature in 1.7.1. However, there is one feature you could add that would immediately improve its utility for me: • A threshold setting or slider that filters out links between participants if the number of messages exchanged is below a certain number of messages/hits. Longer term suggestions (which I'm sure are already in the works) would include: • Ability to aggregate variant email address information (or various email addresses, phone numbers, etc) into a single entity. • A word graph of search terms; if I search for a term, show m
  13. When exporting eml/email files from the Intella the file is empty. Any ideas what might cause this behavior? Also, there appears to be no way to quickly jump to an ID number. So if someone says, "I'm looking at Item ID 194572," is there a way to quickly get to that document by entering the ID?
  14. The HTTPS guide worked very nicely. Thank you Łukasz. One thing I'm noticing now: when previewing some (all?) emails, long lines are not being wrapped in the text area so I must keep scrolling back and forth in the previewer's contents textbox to read the message. Thanks!
  15. This appears to have worked well, thank you!
×
×
  • Create New...