ŁukaszBachman

Hi tcbailey239, I don't think importing these proprietary keys is possible. You will have to find some way to export them to supported format.

Hi John, You should go to the https://console.developers.google.com/apis/library and click on the dropdown in the upper left corner. That opens up a dialog from which you can choose "Create project". I can show you a screenshot of how to do it if this helps (pardon the fact that it's in a different language):

Similar panel is available in Intella Connect:

We are open to getting this done, but there are several tasks which keep our team occupied at the moment. I can only promise we will reevaluate this as soon as more urgent tasks get done.

Hi Bryan, It's true that the output of CMD when processing tasks could be improved, however there is also another option available. Instead of analyzing the output in the console, you might preffer to open case logs and monitor the progress there. Here is a snippet showing when OCRing is starting, progressing and finishing: [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:07,100 [CrawlThread] Total page count: 101 [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:07,109 [CrawlThread] Started OCRing 101 items. Using: ABBYY FineReader Engine [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:07,109 [CrawlThread] Settings: Profile: Accuracy Export format: Plain text Languages: English Number of workers: 10 Detect page orientation: true Correct inverted images: true Skip OCRed: true [WARN ] 2019-03-28 13:40:07,115 [CrawlThread] Skipped encrypted content item: 1373 [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:07,116 [OcrServiceProcessor1] OCRing item: 1243 [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:07,116 [OcrServiceProcessor2] OCRing item: 1244 ... [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:32,470 [CrawlThread] Collecting OCR crawl results [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:32,619 [CrawlThread] Collected 0 records. [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:32,620 [CrawlThread] Importing OCRed text and extracted entities [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:32,889 [CrawlThread] Imported OCR text into 150 items. [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:32,938 [CrawlThread] Updating OCR database [INFO ] 2019-03-28 13:40:33,182 [CrawlThread] Finished OCR. Total time: 0:26. Items processed: 99 You could of course monitor the entire log, or perhaps use some command line programs to grep their contents live for regular expressions of your choosing. That way you can only get information about OCR process itself. As for the second question about preserving temporary files generated during OCRing. It looks like a risky operation for me and if one is not careful enough, it may produce errors which would be very hard to find. Fortunately, it shouldn't be needed once we extend Intella so that it re-applies OCRed text to duplicated items discovered when new sources are being added. This is already on our radar.

Hi PF1, This request has been added to our ticketing system. I think it makes a whole lot of sense.

Hi guys, I tried to reproduce the issue to no avail. I'm sure it must be related to the data being in question. Looks to me that everything is working fine here.

Hi dpmills, Don't feel bad about it - it's indeed a bit hidden. We will be going through a major redesign of Search tab in few releases and we already plan to add more visible sorting editor.

How about exporting the selection to CSV with "Size" column visible, then summing it up in a 3rd party spreadsheet editor? I think this should work fine, given that you don't need to use that feature many times per day.

Hi Paolo1982, Indeed the same syntax is not supported in Headers & Footers. Why can't you use those fields separately and put them into various placeholders individually? Ex. put item ID to the upper left, attachments to the upper-center, etc.?

Server side profiles for users are subject of another feature that we have on our roadmap. As for now they will be stored in browser's storage, so it will be tied to the browser that user is using. Good comment though, it may make me bump the priority of those persistent user profiles in the next release.

Hello dgilbert002, You will be happy to hear that those extensions are currently being worked on and are scheduled for the next version of Intella Connect. Things which will change: Each facet will receive a unique icon visible next to the facet name. Facets will be sortable with drag&drop. One will be allowed to permanently pin facets to a static container (making them visible all the time). Panels related to facets UI will be resizable. One will be allowed to hide/show selected facets on demand. Any other ideas are welcome!

The release is out:

Vound is pleased to announce the official release of Intella and Intella Connect 2.2.2. Intella and Intella Connect 2.2.2 are available from the Downloads section in the Vound Support Portal, after logging in with your email address and password. Users with a 2.1.x license need to use the Dongle Manager to update their dongle to the 2.2.x license. Please read the Release Notes before installing or upgrading, to ensure you do not affect any active cases. Highlights Indexing improvements, including support for Outlook for Mac OLM files. Configurable message hashing algorithm, letting the user control the degree of deduplication on email messages. Extended command-line arguments, allowing for better automation. Various redaction improvements, including setting the redaction rectangle’s color. The redaction functionalities added in the 2.2.1 version are now also available in remote cases.

Hi guys, Just wanted to give you a quick update on this. The development of all of features mentioned above has been completed. I'm now in the process of testing and QA these changes. They will become a part of the next (2.2.2) release.

Hi Jason, I made a mistake and used term "Closed" when I meant "Completed". I will update my previous post. We are also looking into supporting other sort orders, I haven't mentioned it here because it is not relevant for the original thread. If all goes well we should add this feature in next release. As for the progress recalculation - do you think a button "Recalculate progress" could work here?

See this topic for more info about this.

Just a quick update - we are starting development of few extensions in this area. These are: New permission: users with special permission will be able to reopen their own batches and later close (mark as Completed) them manually. New permission: users with special permission will be able to reopen batches assigned to any user and later close (mark as Completed) them manually. New permission: users with special permission will be able to mark batch as Completed regardless of previous status (with an exception of Archived status) New permission: users with special permission will be restricted to seeing only batches assigned to them, therefore working in isolated mode where they case manager can only assign them batches. They will also not be able to grab unassigned batches by themselves. Modification: users with "CAN_CHANGE_BATCH_ASSIGNEE" permission will be able to reassign batch regardless of the status (allowing for completed batches to be reassigned) Modification: batch creation dialog will be extended with an option allowing to skip initial calculation of batch progress upon its creation. This will allow for new batches to be created for the same set of items using the same coding layout as previously, without automatically marking the newly created batch as Completed. Note: status of batches in "Reopened" state will not be automatically recalculated. Therefore if you reopen a batch then the only way to complete it will be to click on "Complete" button. If you have further suggestions I'm all ears. Thanks for feedback!

Vince, maybe your keyword search is too complex to be evaluated in 3 minutes timeout. The solution might be to split it into smaller chunks or reduce the complexity (by eliminating excessive use of wildcards, for instance). There might also be a way out by bumping the timeout parameter to a higher value.

That's what I'm thinking. Perhaps your firewall is blocking such requests? Can you try loging in to your machine 192.168.100.50 and accessing it from there?

Hi Dale, I'll need to think where to fit this in in our roadmap. Have you done any research about this topic already? I know that oauth is a well defined standard, but does being "oauth compliant" means that Connect could be configured with few params to work with either FB, Google or any other prioprietary implementation? So I guess it should be similar to LDAP integration in this regard.

Hi Dwayne, Can you try entering the Service Url into browser and see if it responds with a valid XML file? That's usually the first thing to check.

Hi guys, As an author of Batching & Coding functionality, I can say - I hear you I will put this on a short-term wishlist, but "short" will probably mean at least a couple of releases.

Sure, it's worth considering. I'll put it on wishlist.

Hi Fuzed, If reviewer is granted with minimum set of permissions related to batching ("Can access a case" & "Main UI: can use Review"), then he has the ability to do the following: See batches list Assign a batch to himself if it was previously unassigned Review batches assigned to him That is how we designed the minimum set of features. If you don't want him to be able to assign "free" batches to him, just make sure that there are no free batches (use manager permissions to (re)assign batches). He will still be able to see general metadata about other batches (name, reviewer, progress, etc.) because we decided that it's good for reviewers to see the overall status of the review (answering the question "where are we currently at?").